 |
 |
 |
 |
The New World Order's Attack on European Christians
Why would a government use immigration to undermine its own national unity and identity?
A remarkable phenomenon has overtaken North America and Western Europe in the last three decades of the Twentieth Century - elites' deliberate destruction of their own nations' religious and ethnic populations.
Elites in Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Canada and the United States have promoted birth control, abortion, homosexuality and feminism. In the United States, for example, this promotion was accomplished by federal judicial decisions invalidating state and local laws limiting or prohibiting birth control, abortion and homosexuality. In Griswold v. Connecticut, federal judges invented a "right to privacy" that trumped state laws restricting condom sales. In Roe v. Wade, abortion, a crime in 48 states, became a constitutional right. And in Romer v. Evans, the Supreme Court held that State citizens could not vote down special rights for homosexuals.
When one item on the elites' agenda - feminism - was once put up for a democratic vote, they lost. But even though the Equal Rights Amendment was voted down, federal judges enacted it anyway, by judicial fiat, re-interpreting the Constitution's equal protection clause to effect the ERA's desired result. See, Boren v. Oklahoma. Feminism [1] is a court-ordered ideology.
What do the promotion of birth control, abortion ("reproductive choice"), "feminism," "assisted suicide" [2] and homosexuality (Being "gay") have in common? All of these policies tend to suppress reproduction and population growth. After winning World War 2, North American and Western European nations quite naturally experienced a population surge usually referred to as the "baby boom." By 1970, North America and Western Europe orchestrated a dramatic turn around in the growth rate of their domestic (i.e. European Christian) populations, achieving first zero population growth and then falling below the replacement rate.
Promulgation and funding of these policies was an elite priority, accomplished over a great deal of popular resistance. Population control propagandists exalt Margaret Sanger as the founder of their movement. This registered nurse from upstate New York may have been queen for a time, but she was not the power behind the throne. The Rockefeller Foundation made and continues to make massive donations of money to Planned Parenthood. The Population Council, the foremost population control advocacy group, was founded in 1952 by John D. Rockefeller 3d. The Rockefellers also fund the population control projects of the United Nations. The United Nations headquarters itself sits on prime Manhattan real estate donated by the Rockefellers. The Ford Foundation also contributes heavily to population control projects. A 1968 population control anthology included 11 different authors having connections to the Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller University, the United Nations, Planned Parenthood and the Population Council. [3]
Consistent with the international presence of these organizations, population control policies were implemented in a coordinated fashion by the governments of North America and Western Europe. Massive media support was obtained. These policies are coherent methods of reducing population. Their implementation was not an accident. The policies have worked. In 1950, 32% of the world's population lived in Europe, North America, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. In other words, 32% of the world's population was of European Christian ancestry. Today that figure is 12%. [4]
Mass immigration is the flip side of population control. Dwindling populations present a different but unacceptable alternative to elites - tightening labor markets. With fewer available workers, labor's bargaining position improves, and higher wages result.
Do not doubt that financial elites support mass immigration to avoid labor shortages and control wages:
Higher wages can also mean inflation and declining returns on capital investment. Alan Greenspan apparently believes the only function of the Federal Reserve is to forestall inflation by undermining labor's bargaining position and suppressing wages.
The solution to labor shortages is massive immigration, adopted more or less simultaneously by the governments of Western Europe and North America. Immigration eases any potential labor shortages caused by the suppression of domestic populations. Thus, the labor supply can be controlled, even "fine tuned" by immigration policy, such as the United States H-1B visa program.
As a percentage of the population, immigrants now count for nearly one in 10 United States residents, the highest proportion in seven decades. The raw number is 26.3 million. These are Unites States Census numbers, which don't take into account illegal immigration. And as anyone living in Texas, Arizona and California know, illegal immigration is rampant.
For the most part, these new immigrants aren't coming from Europe, but from Central America and Asia. Not only has the federal government dramatically increased the number of immigrants, it has chosen to draw them from different cultural, religious and racial backgrounds. Between 1951 and 1960, more than half of the immigrants to the United States came from Europe. In the last ten years, Europe's contribution is down to 18%. [6] Elite policymakers are using immigration to launch a demographic attack on European Christian America.
The suppression of domestic population combined with massive non-European immigration can produce only one result in these United States - the destruction of European Christian culture and eventually, European Christians. Already, Bill Clinton and Bill Bradley have announced that European Christians will become a minority in America by the year 2040. Bradley issued a polite warning to European Americans: "The economic future of White American children will depend increasingly on the children of non-white Americans." [7]
During NATO's war on Yugoslavia, Strobe Talbot and Wesley Clark have stated, on behalf of the New World Order, that there is no longer room for nations based on a single ethnicity or religion. The New World Order recognizes only "multi-ethic states" ("State" is NWO-speak for "Nation"). Apparently, these policies are purely the product of official fiat. They have no legitimate basis in the democratically enacted law of any nation.
The effort to suppress population has affected mainly European Christians. Over the last three decades, the birth rates in most of Asia and Africa have remained high. Only Western European and North American governments have successfully sponsored domestic population control and mass immigration. According to some, Europe isn't sufficiently keeping pace with the United States. "You have European governments that continue to deploy the most sophisticated forms of immigration control... Europeans had better get ready for change" said Arthur C. Helton, an "international lawyer" and senior fellow of the Council on Foreign Relations. [8]
In 1900, the most populous cities of the world were in North America and Europe. By 2020, New York City and Los Angeles will no longer rank in the top ten - pushed off the list by Dhaka, Bangladesh, Karachi, Pakistan and Jakarta, Indonesia. [9]
The relative explosion of third world population is not an accident. U.S. taxpayer aid and multinational corporate presence generate investment and jobs in third world nations formerly having mere subsistence economies. Their populations swell with cheap labor that laps at the edges of their industrialized cities. Their standard of living is abysmal compared to that enjoyed by the dwindling European/American citizenry. But the financial elites are happy with this arrangement; there they have built their factories for the 21st century.
The third world populations pose no real challenges to the political elites of the New World Order. Populations accustomed to centuries of tyranny and bondage are in fact desirable. Their transfer of allegiance from dictator and shaman to United Nations bureaucrat is expected to be uneventful. People who never had the right to bear arms don't need to be disarmed. People who don't know what a "jury" is won't question the legitimacy of courts that don't employ them. People unfamiliar with the concept "inalienable right," such as those in China, will accept government policies that every family is limited to one child.
Unlike the European Christian people, third world populations are ideally suited to the requirements of New World Order government - citizens without rights, labor without dignity.
Why is anyone surprised that the destruction of the European Christian people is thought to be desirable?
"A labor shortage simply means that wages would rise...That doesn't seem very bad to me, and I find it difficult to understand why anyone except their employers would want to forestall it by importing more workers. In fact however, some conservative economists argue that American wages are too high now, and that high immigration is good because it keeps wages lower...However, I think it's a pretty fair assumption that most Americans would rather not have their wages lowered. And it's in the best interests of Americans - most of whom live on wages rather than on income from investments or savings ...to ensure that they don't get paid less for the work they do." [5]
Footnotes:
[1] An oxymoron in practice - it apparently means the masculinization of women.
[3] Population in Perspective," Louise B. Young, Ed., Oxford University Press, 1968.
[4] Anthony C. LoBaido, "The Overpopulation Lie", WorldNetDaily, May 2, 2000.
[6] L. Bowman, "United States Changing in Surprising Ways," Associated Press, April 22, 2000.
[7] Associated Press, February 14, 1998.
[9] "Population Institute" report issued 12/29/2000.